Pulse is the operating surface for people who direct rather than execute. You describe the outcome, break it into work, and hand it to agents. The platform holds the sequence, stops at the decisions that carry consequence, and keeps the account of everything that happened.
Work arrives, gets shaped into outcomes, and is sequenced with its dependencies. A board a director can read at a glance, not a ticket queue.
State the objective, the constraints, and what correct looks like — in a form the machine executes and a person can check. Explore →
Hand the work to agents and let the platform run the chain: it picks up what is unblocked, and stops where you told it to stop. Explore →
Most AI tooling is sold to the people doing the work, and it makes them faster. Pulse is for the person who has to answer for the result. That is a different product: the unit is a workflow rather than a prompt, the important events are decisions rather than completions, and success is measured by whether you could reconstruct what happened if someone asked.
Nobody needs to translate your instruction into a ticket. The specification is the instruction, and it is the thing agents execute against.
Parallel where the work is independent, sequential where it is not. You watch the outcome, not the keystrokes.
Each gate has an owner who can actually stop the process, see what it did, and take the time to think. Accountability that survives a regulator asking.
Pulse is designed around the EU AI Act's requirement that oversight sit with named, competent persons — not as a compliance afterthought, but as the product. Traceability, certification, and the audit trail are the centre of the system, not overhead bolted to the edge.
Security & governance →We run it against your real workflows and show you what the record looks like after a week.